#Hp ilo 4 driver driver
It is true that David (or HP) definitely could have done a better job in describing why this driver is needed and what HP-Utilities are depending on it.
Somehow I feel the need to step in, as I believe that this thread is really going in the wrong direction. > This driver can't be handled on its own, that would lead to a mess in > interfaces to do stuff would be nice, but I'd really like to handle this > That seems like a larger question/goal. > but "hide hardware differences" is more important goal. Yes, keep stuff in userspace is important, > goal here: move what you can to userspace. From my limited understanding, I thought that was a common > (ie read/write), and handle the details of the commands in user > It seems much cleaner to keep the kernel interface simple and opaque > And neither can they speak, because you did not tell us what the iLO > (I assume management processors have pretty similar functionality > You could at least provide list of high-level functionality. > and the question of documentation was raised. > Unfortunately, I don't believe that I can. > Could you provide the list of commands (at least) so we can be more > On Tue 22:19:18, Altobelli, David wrote: Next in thread: Altobelli, David: "RE: HP iLO driver".In reply to: Pavel Machek: "Re: HP iLO driver".Previous message: Krzysztof Halasa: " ARM: IXP4xx Ethernet NAPI fix".Next message: Dmitry: "Re: MFD: Coding style fixes".Linux-Kernel Archive: Re: HP iLO driver Re: HP iLO driver From: Martin Knoblauch
0 kommentar(er)
